Estimation of Elisa diagnosis efficiency at swine trichinellosis

Verkhovsky O.A., Tsibezov V.V., Balandina M.V., Shevkoplyas V.N., Aliper T.I., Chernykh O.Yu.

Summary

Sensitive and specific serologic test kit based on solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) named as "Trichinella-Serotest" has been evaluated for the detection of anti-Trichinella antibodies in porcine serum and meat juice samples. ELISA was developed using excretory-secretory antigens (E/S) from in vitro cultivated Trichinella spp. muscle larvae and the aim of this study was to compare ELISA results with taking results of artificial digestion method as gold standard. For this purpose 347 domestic pigs and 5 wild boars from different areas of Krasnodar region were examined for swine trichnellosis by both methods and positive results for 10 domestic pigs and 3 wild boars were obtained and analyzed. Results showed that all Trichinella-free domestic pigs were ELISA negative whereas sera from all Trichinella-infected animals contain specific antibodies which are detectable by ELISA. For wild boars it demonstrates that blood samples can be taken and tested simultaneously with meat juice samples by ELISA for confirmation diagnosis of trichinellosis. In conclusion, ELISA-kit "Trichinella-Serotest" is effective for veterinary laboratories and can be used for monitoring of swine Trichinella infection.

Key words: trichinellosis, domestic pigs, wild boars, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA-kit Trichinella-Serotest, sensitivity, specificity, diagnosis.

References

  1. Vasilevich F.I., Shevkoplyas V.N. Parazitarnye zoonozy [Parasitic zoonoses]. – Veterinariya Kubani. – Krasnodar, 2012 (3). – pp.5-11.
  2. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po laboratornoy diagnostike trikhinelleza zhivotnykh [Practical for laboratory diagnostics of animal trichinellosis]. – Moscow, 1998.
  3. Cui J., Wang Z.Q. An epidemiological overview of swine trichinellosis in China // Vet. J., 2011, V.190 (3), P.323-328.
  4. Gamble H.R., Pozio E., Bruschi F. et al. International commission on Trichinellosis: recommendations on the use of serological tests for the detection of Trichinella infection in animals and human // Parasite, 2004, V.11, P. 3–13.
  5. Gamble H.R., Rapić D., Marinculić A., Murrell K.D. Evaluation of excretory-secretory antigens for the serodiagnosis of swine trichinellosis // Vet. Parasitol., 1988, V.30 (2), P.131-137.
  6. Gómez-Morales M.A., Ludovisi A., Amati M. et al. A distinctive Western blot pattern to recognize Trichinella infections in humans and pigs // Int. J. Parasitol., 2012, V.42(11), P.1017-1023.
  7. Gómez-Morales M.A., Ludovisi A., Pezzotti P. et al. International ring trial to detect anti-Trichinella IgG by ELISA on pig sera // Vet. Parasitol., 2009, V.166 (3-4), P.241-248.
  8. Gross S., Greiner M., Mayer-Scholl A. et al. Surveillance systems for status monitoring of Trichinella-free declared pig farms: concepts and their confidence for freedom from disease // Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr., 2012, V.125 (11-12), P.482-493.
  9. Murrell K.D, Zarlenga D.S. Immunodiagnosis of swine trichinellosis // Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health., 1991, 22 Suppl., P.321-325.
  10. Nöckler K., Reckinger S., Broglia A. et al. Evaluation of a Western Blot and ELISA for the detection of anti-Trichinella-IgG in pig sera // Vet. Parasitol., 2009, V.163(4), P.341-347.
  11. Schuppers M.E., Rosenberg G., Graf R. et al. A study to demonstrate freedom from Trichinella spp. in domestic pigs in Switzerland // Zoonoses Public Health, 2010, V.57 (7-8), P. 130-135.
  12. Széll Z., Marucci G., Ludovisi A. et al. Spatial distribution of Trichinella britovi, T. spiralis and T. pseudospiralis of domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Hungary // Vet. Parasitol., 2012, V.183 (3-4), P. 393-396.
  13. Thi N.V., De N.V., Praet N. et al. Seroprevalence of trichinellosis in domestic animals in northwestern Vietnam // Vet. Parasitol., 2012, in press.
  14. World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). Trichinellosis. Manual of Standards for diagnostic test and vaccines, 2012, Ch.2.1.16.

Author affiliation

Tsibezov Valery V., Ph.D. in Biology, leading research associate of the Independent non-profit organization "Diagnostic and Prevention Research Institute for Human and Animal Diseases" (DPRI); 16, Gamaleya st., Moscow, 123098; phone: +7 (499) 190-75-61; e-mail: tsibezov@yandex.ru.

Balandina Marina V., Ph.D. in Biology, leading research associate of the Independent non-profit organization "Diagnostic and Prevention Research Institute for Human and Animal Diseases (DPRI); 16. Gamaleya st., Moscow, 123098; phone: +7 (499) 190-75-61; e-mail: info@dpri.ru.

Shevkoplyas Vladimir N., D.Sc. in Veterinary Medicine, professor of the department of veterinary-sanitary examination of the Skryabin Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology; 23, Skryabina st., Moscow, 109472; phone: 8 (499) 784-62-19; e-mail: shevkoplyasvn@gmail.com.

Aliper Taras I., D.Sc. in Biology, professor, director of the NARVAC Ltd; 16, Gamaleya str., Moscow, 123098; phone: +7 (499) 190-30-54; e-mail: aliper@narvac.com.

Chernykh Oleg Yu., D.Sc. in Veterinary Medicine, director of the Kropotkin territorial veterinary laboratory; 303, Krasnoarmeyskaya st., Kropotkin, 352380; phone: +7 (86138) 6-23-14; e-mail: gukkvl50@kubanvet.ru.

Responsible for correspondence with the editorial board: Verkhovsky Oleg A., D.Sc. in Biology, professor, president of the Independent non-profit organization "Diagnostic and Prevention Research Institute for Human and Animal Diseases (DPRI)"; 16. Gamaleya st., Moscow, 123098; phone: +7 (499) 190-75-61; e-mail: info@dpri.ru.

http://vetkuban.com/en/num1_20131.html